DepEd
Order No. 8 s. 2015
Policy
Guidelines on Classroom Assessment for the K to 12 Basic Education Program
- Theoretical
Basis
“Teachers provide appropriate
assessment when they aim to holistically measure learners’ current and
developing abilities while enabling them to take responsibility in the process”
A. Recognizes
the following:
a. Diversity
of the learners inside the classroom
b. The
need for the multiple ways of measuring their varying abilities and learning
potentials
c. The
role of learners as co-participants in the assessment process
B. Recognizes
and considers the learners’ zone of proximal development (Vygotsky 1978)
C. Committed
to ensure:
a. Learners’
success in moving from guided to independent display of knowledge,
understanding, and skills
b. Successful
transfer of knowledge, understanding and skills in future situations
c. The
development of learners’ higher-order thinking and 21st-century
skills.
- Classroom
Assessment
“Classroom
Assessment is an ongoing process of identifying, gathering, organizing and
interpreting quantitative and qualitative information about what learners know
and can do.”
A. Assessment
is used to:
a. Keep
track of learners’ progress in relation to learning standards and in the
development of 21st –century skills
b. Promote
self-reflection and personal accountability among students about their own
learning
c. Provide
bases for the profiling of the student performance on the learning competencies
and standards of the curriculum
B. Two
types of classroom assessment:
a. Formative
Assessment
1. Assessment
for learning
2. Assessment
as learning
3. Characteristically
informal and intended to help students identify strengths and weaknesses
4. May
be given any time during the teaching and learning process
5. A
way to check the effectiveness of instruction
6. Important
to record to track learning progress
7. Not
included in the computation of summative assessment
8. The
teacher must provide an immediate feedback
9. Recommendations
on how to improve themselves should also be given
b. Summative
Assessment
1. Assessment
of learning
2. Occurs
at the end of a particular unit
3. Measures
whether learners have met the content and performance standards
4. Recorded
and used to report on the learners’ achievements
- What is
assessed in the classroom?
a. Content
Standards identify and set the essential knowledge and understanding that
should be learned.
b. Performance
Standards describe the abilities and skills that learners are expected to
demonstrate in relation to the content standards.
c. Learning
Competencies refer to the knowledge, understanding, skills and attitudes that
the students need to demonstrate in every lesson and/or learning activity.
- How are
learners assessed in the classroom?
A. Individual
and Collaborative Formative Assessment
a. Individual
formative assessment enables the learners to demonstrate independently what has
been learned or mastered through a range of activities
b. Collaborative
formative assessment allows students to support each other’s learning
c. Formative
Assessment in Different Parts of the Lesson.
B. Individual
and Collaborative Summative Assessment
a. Learners
may be assessed individually through unit test and quarterly assessment
b. Collaboratively,
learners may participate in the group activities in which they cooperate to
produce evidence of their learning
c. Components
of Summative Assessment
1. Written Work Component
ensures that learners are able to express skills and concept in written form
2. Performance Task Component
allows learners to show what they know and are able to do in diverse ways
3. Quarterly Assessment measures
student learning at the end of the quarter
- The Grading
System
The K to 12 basic Education Program uses a
standard- and competency-based grading system. All grades will be based on the
weighted raw score of the learners’ summative assessments. The minimum grade
needed to pass a specific learning area is 60, which is transmuted to 75 in the
report card. The lowest mark that can appear on the report card is 60 for
Quarterly Grades and Final Grades.
A. Recording
and Computing Learners’ Progress
1. For
Kindergarten
Checklist
and anecdotal records are used instead of numerical grades. These are based on
learning standards found in the kindergarten curriculum guide. It is important
to keep a portfolio, which is a record or compilation of the learners’ output.
This can provide concrete evidence on how much the learner is able to accomplish
the skills and competencies.
2. For
Grades 1-12
a. There
is one Quarterly Assessment but there should be instances for students to
produce Written Woks and to demonstrate what they know and can do through
Performance Tasks.
b. Steps
in computing the Final Grades
i.
Grades from all student work are added
up. This results in the total score for each component (WW, PT, QA)
ii.
The sum of each component is converted
to the Percentage Score (PS). Divide the raw score the highest possible score
the multiply the quotient by 100%
iii.
PS are then converted to Weighted
Scores (WS). Multiply the PS to the weight of each component:
Table 4: Weight of components for Grades 1-10
Grades 1-10
|
Components
|
Language
|
AP
|
EsP
|
Science
|
Math
|
MAPEH
|
EPP/TLE
|
WW
|
30%
|
40%
|
20%
|
|||||
PT
|
50%
|
40%
|
60%
|
|||||
QA
|
20%
|
20%
|
20%
|
iv.
The sum of the Weighted Scores in each
component is the Initial Grade (IG). This IG will be transmuted using the given
transmutation table to get the Quarterly Grade (QG)
v.
The QG for each learning area is
written in the report card of the students
3. Computation of grades
at the end of school year
a. For Kindergarten
·
Descriptions of the learners’ progress
in the various learning areas are represented using checklists and students
portfolio’s these are presented to the parents at the end of each quarter for
discussions
b. For
Grades 1-10
·
The average of the Quarterly Grades
produces the Final Grade
c. For
Grades 11-12
·
The two quarters determine the Final
Grade in a Semester.
4. The Reporting of
Learner’s Progress
·
The summary of learner progress is
shown quarterly to parents and guardians through a parent-teacher conference,
in which the report card is discussed. The grading scale, with the
corresponding descriptors, is in the table below. Remarks are given at the end
of the grade level.
5. The Promotion and
Retention of learners at the end of the School year
- Core
values of the Filipino Child reflected in the Report card
·
A non-numerical rating scale will be
used to report on learners’ behavior demonstrating the core values. The class
adviser and other teachers shall agree on how to conduct these observations.
They will also discuss how each child will be rated.
VII. Attendance
·
The number of school days in each
month is presented, which is based on the school calendar for a given school
year. The number of days that each learner is present and absent is indicated.
·
A learner who incurs absences of more
than 20% of the prescribed number of class or laboratory periods during the
school year or semester should be given a failing grade and not earn credits
for the learning area or subject.
- To
whom is Classroom Assessment reported?
·
Classroom assessment serves to help
teachers and parents understand the learners’ progress on curriculum standards.
The results of assessment are reported to the child, the child’s remedial
teacher, if any, and the teacher of the next grade level, as well as the
child’s parents/guardians.
REFERENCES:
Republic Act no.
10533, “An Act Enhancing the Philippine
Basic Education System by Strengthening its Curriculum and Increasing the
number of years for Basic Education, Approaching Funds Therefor and for Other
Purposes”.
DepEd Order No. 43, s. 2013: “Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) of the Republic Act No. 10533
Otherwise known as the Enhanced Basic Education act of 2013”.
DepEd Order No. 8 s. 2015: “Policy Guidelines on Classroom Assessment for the K to 12 Basic
Education Program”.
Anderson, Lorin W., and Krathwol, David R. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and
Assessing: Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New
York:Longman, 2001
UNESCO. “Teaching
and Learning for a Sustainable Future.” Accessed March 31, 2015. http://www.unesco.org/education/tlsf/mods/theme_d/mod24.html?panel=5#top.
Vygotsky, Lev S., Mind
in Society: The Development of the Higher Psychological Processes., eds. M.
Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner,
& E. souberman. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1978)
Grant and Jay McTighe. “Understanding by Design:
Professional Development Workbook”. Alexandria, VA: Association for
Supervision and Curriculum Development. 2004
Private
Educational Assistance Committee (PEAC). Summer 2015 In-Service Training for
Private Schools: “Classroom Assessment
for the K to 12 Basic Education Program”. NCR, Trinity University of Asia. July
3-5, 2015
No comments:
Post a Comment